Categories & Criteria

Judges will be looking for evidence of: 

• quality risk modelling, and details of the data behind actuarial decisions; 
• case studies demonstrating the performance of US captive clients; 
• numbers demonstrating growth/expansion in the actuarial firm itself;
• how the firm has introduced a new innovation and/or technology to the benefit of clients

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• delivering clients a quick and efficient service in their tax reporting and/or audit requirements;
• case studies where the firm have understood and responded well to a specific/unique set of requirements;
• numbers demonstrating growth in the audit & accountancy firm
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• quality service when placing reinsurance for ART programmes;
• case studies of where a broker has gone above and beyond in the level of service/support provided to a US captive client;
• numbers demonstrating growth in the broker's captive services department
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• a specific project involving firms that produced an innovative captive solution to a problem, a solution that wouldn’t have been possible without the collaboration;
• what each party did in the collaboration, looking for as close to an equal input as possible;
• the positive outcomes of this collaboration, ideally backed up by numbers
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• deep knowledge of a specific/niche area of regulation/compliance;
• case studies where a compliance specialist as demonstrated excellence, either in the level of niche knowledge or in how quickly they have responded to changes in regulation
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• expertise in risk management solutions;
• case studies of the consultancy service provided to a US captive client and the positive outcomes this advice generated for the client;
• customer satisfaction among captive clients;
• growth in the captive consultancy itself
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• excellence in the response of domicile regulators to its captives' needs, either through regulation, or any other proactive initiatives;
• numbers demonstrating growth in the domicile, in both number of captives and growth in premium;
• innovations introduced that have had a clear positive outcome, ideally backed by numbers
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• excellence in the response of domicile regulators to its captives' needs, either through regulation, or any other proactive initiatives;
• numbers demonstrating growth in the domicile, in both number of captives and growth in premium;
• innovations introduced that have had a clear positive outcome, ideally backed by numbers
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• how a captive manager or risk manager has implemented a specific innovation;
• the positive outcomes it created, ideally backed by numbers;
• the wider impact this innovation could have on the captive industry, the more groundbreaking the better
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• case studies demonstrating excellence in service to their captive owner clients backed by performance numbers ;
• growth in the captive manager itself, in both client numbers, written premium and revenue;
• a ideas/innovations implemented to improve client satisfaction
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• case studies demonstrating excellence in service to their captive owner clients backed by performance numbers ;
• growth in the captive manager itself, in both client numbers, written premium and revenue;
• a ideas/innovations implemented to improve client satisfaction
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of

• excellence in risk management performance, backed by numbers;
• improvement in claims performance in one or multiple areas of the parent business;
• case studies demonstrating an innovative way improved risk management processes have been implemented at the parent organisation
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of

• excellence in servicing a US captive insurance company, including details of how they have gone above and beyond to help a client or the industry as a whole;
• case studies of the proactive steps they have taken in the last year to produce positive outcomes;
• innovation and a willingness to take the industry to new places
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• innovation/originality in an approach to cell captive solutions;
• case studies of how a cell captive initiative has overcome difficult regulatory and/or specific client challenges to deliver a successful outcome;
• how a cell captive initiative has helped a captive to an improved financial performance for the client than would otherwise have been possible 
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• how a claims handling firm or TPA has gone above and beyond to provide excellence in customer service;
• a new initiative implemented that has substatntially improved the efficiency/speed with which claims can be dealt with;
• case studies where the claims handling firm/TPA has provided a quality service to handle a particularly challenging/specialist claim; numbers demonstrating growth in the firm itself
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• how a collateral provider has been able to deliver a quality and efficient service;
• case studies of how a collateral provider has been able to support a client in a unique/challenging situation that required a specialised level of skill; numbers demonstrating growth in the firm itself, including the the increase in client numbers and retention of existing clients
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• how an organisation has developed an initiative to improve the ESG performance of US captives owners;
• case studies of how the ESG has helped particular clients to adopt an ESG plan where otherwise they were unable to; the successful outcomes that have come about, for both the company itself and the client, as a result of this initiative
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• how a young person working in the industry has displayed skill/talent above and beyond what would be expected
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• specialist knowledge in the field of employee benefits; -
• case studies of how the EB network has delivered a client with an EB solution perfectly moulded to the specific needs of a business, and details of the challenges overcome to provide it; 
• numbers demonstrating the growth in the EB network itself
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of: 

• how an insurance company has provided a quality and efficient fronting service to US captives; case studies of how the fronter has developed a nuanced approach to fronting for a particular client, demonstrating an ability to adjust their proposition for specific client needs;
• numbers demonstrating growth in the fronters proposition, in terms of both client numbers and premium fronted
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• growth in captive numbers;
• case studies of how staff at the international regulator engaged with a captive owner in either the formation of a new captive, or to overcome a persistent issue; a
• willingness to embrace new ideas and innovation to the benefit of captive owners
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• how an asset manager or investment advisor has developed a specialist captive department to meet the captive industry's investment needs;
• case studies of the lengths investment specialist have gone to for a particular captive client to build them a well-constructed and balanced investment portfolio that produces impressive returns, backed by the financial numbers and comparisons to other rival's portfolios/industry standard;
• numbers demonstrating the general returns of their captive clients and detail on the work that goes into improving these returns; numbers demonstrating growth in the investment specialist itself, both in client numbers and values invested
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of: 

• excellence in providing a restructuring or exit solution to a captive or other ART program; 
• case studies of particular deals that have delivered successful outcomes to both the client and the legacy provider; how the legacy provider has been able to deliver a superior claims management service on the acquired legacy book
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• how a legal department or law firm has delivered excellence in service to a US client and their captives;
• case studies showing deep legal expertise in a specialist/niche area highly relevant to a particular client;
• growth in the legal firm/department itself, backed by numbers
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• how the organisation has put in place a NextGen initiative to usher in the next generation of talent; 
• case studies demonstrating individuals that have recently come through the organisation's NextGen initiative, and their achievements; 
• a willingness to try new innovative methods for making more young people aware of captive insurance and its merits as a career
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of:

• quality service from a company providing a software solution serving the US captive insurance market;
• case studies showing how the software meets a specific need from one or more captive clients can not be easily found/replicated elsewhere; how the software provider as utilized innovative and new technologies to deliver a unique and groundbreaking product to the industry; numbers demonstrating growth in the utilization of the software solution
  

Judges will be looking for evidence of

• how an insurance/reinsurance company has assisted a US-owned captive with a specialist underwriting solution; 
• case studies of how the insurer/reinsurer has helped a client with a range of services to support the success of the captive; growth in the underwriter's captive proposition, backed by numbers